Skip to main content

Day two in our five-part series on the most-overlooked stories of the FISA debate.

Telecom immunity may very well give President Bush immunity for years of domestic spying and warrantless wiretapping

This week, fellow Kos diarist Patriot Daily News Clearinghouse posted a piece outlining in great detail how President Bush’s push for telecom immunity may be a shadow push for his own protection.

What it means

    • By granting immunity to the telecoms for their participation and cooperation in the administration’s domestic spying program, Congress would be also acknowledging that President Bush had the authority to order the program, thereby legally insulating him.

Why it matters

    • Like so many dealings with this White House, we’re only getting part of the story – most likely, the smallest part. This is another case of the Bush administration trying to sell a bill of goods to Congress and the American people before we get a good look at what exactly we’re getting. It’s a perfect example of why Congress needs to slow this process down and realize that amending FISA and granting immunity are two very different issues.

    • Senators need to demand to see the legal opinions that the administration used as a basis for its warrantless wiretapping program – the opinions that Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) lambasted in a December floor speech. The bottom line is that any vote on immunity would be premature. Senators cannot make an informed decision without knowing what happened to American phone calls and emails and the justifications used to access them.


Originally posted to ACLU on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 07:44 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks, ACLU! (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    x, SallyCat, Terminus Est, gdwtch52

    You guys are heroes!  And you're way out ahead of on this one.  As usual.

    You can be as free as you want, so long as Republicans control birth, death, sex and marriage. And whose vote counts.

    by ultrageek on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 07:53:28 AM PST

  •  Sign the ACLU petition to Reid (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    SallyCat, gdwtch52

    Write to Dodd (and even the other senators) and voice support for his filibuster against retro immunity.

    Write to Pelosi and your Reps in Congress and voice your support for their version of the FISA bill that doesn't contain retroactive immunity and ask that they refuse to accept immunity in a conference bill with the senate.

    Demand clear, unequivocal statements against immunity from Obama, Clinton, and Edwards.

    "Events are in the saddle and ride mankind." --Ralph Waldo Emerson

    by Terminus Est on Thu Jan 17, 2008 at 08:01:46 AM PST

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site