Skip to main content

On Tuesday I received notice that the American Civil Liberties Union had created a new blog called "Blog Rights—Because Freedom Can’t Blog Itself." I smiled as I thought about the controversial history of this group. Unless you are newly arrived from another planet, you’ve heard this organization attacked and ridiculed as a left-wing group that uses the courts to subvert the Constitution. Others—me included, and I suspect a growing number of Americans—believe the ACLU has been, and remains, a critical watchdog in protecting civil liberties and preserving the Constitution.

The reason I suspect the number of supporters is growing is that it is harder and harder to deny the assault on civil liberties and the Constitution by the Bush administration. While I am grateful for the ACLU’s attention to those matters in the present, my own reasons are also personal, going back many years to a time when some of my civil liberties were abrogated without recourse to due process.  

There are many organizations working now to preserve our civil liberties and protect the Constitution, and I am grateful for them all; but the ACLU has a special history. Since it’s founding in 1920 it has been at the center of controversy and public debate around issues of free speech, abortion, the death penalty, illegal immigration, the war on terror, drug policies, civil rights, separation of church and state, and many more.  The ACLU has gone before the U.S. Supreme Court more times than any other organization besides the Department of Justice.

There are many organizations working now to preserve our civil liberties and protect the Constitution, and I am grateful for them all; but the ACLU has a special history. Since it’s founding in 1920 it has been at the center of controversy and public debate around issues of free speech, abortion, the death penalty, illegal immigration, the war on terror, drug policies, civil rights, separation of church and state, and many more.  The ACLU has gone before the U.S. Supreme Court more times than any other organization besides the Department of Justice.

Some of the cases taken by the ACLU have angered both the Right and Left and cost them members. Do you recall how in 1978 they represented the free speech rights of neo-Nazis in Skokie, Illinois? Or in 1997 they defended the First Amendment rights of anti-abortion protesters? Or in 2001 when nine former ACLU leaders opposed the National Office of the ACLU over the McCain-Feingold Bill, which revised the limits on political campaign contributions and expenditures? I doubt that anyone agrees with all of the positions they have taken, but I’m glad they are there, defending civil liberties and the Constitution.  They take 6,000 cases a year!

In their new blog they will be addressing issues about which I am deeply concerned: the authorization of the use of torture by top Bush administration officials; the fight for due process at Guantánamo Bay; warrantless wiretapping and domestic surveillance; and the continued struggle to ensure equality and civil rights for all Americans.

The blog opened with a symposium on "Torture and America" with a couple of bloggers I trust: Joan (McJoan) McCarter from DailyKos and Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com.  

Check out the symposium and consider how grateful we all should be for the illustrious history—even when it made us mad—of the ACLU, a national treasure.

 

Originally posted to Milos Janus Outlook on Wed May 21, 2008 at 08:13 AM PDT.

Poll

Are you grateful for the ACLU and its 88-year history?

100%27 votes
0%0 votes
0%0 votes

| 27 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site